The school board
meeting scheduled for tomorrow (the 9th) has been postponed until
next Monday, December 16th. As everyone checks the district’s website for news about
school closure, we can’t help but notice that the district’s email, previously
sent to all the staff, has been posted on the home page. One would think that
sending such an email to all employees would be sufficient, but perhaps they
wanted to cover their bases in case any teachers didn’t read their email. In
case that’s a concern, we should also disseminate the CEA’s response as broadly
as possible. Here is the letter the CEA sent out in response.
December 3,
2013
From the CEA
Bargaining Team
All CEA
Members,
We want to thank
the District Bargaining Team and Board of Directors for encouraging you to
contact us if you have any questions about the current negotiations situation.
It’s important that all interested parties have access to the most accurate
information possible as we go forward.
A few
clarifications: The district's letter stated that the district’s proposal offers
something “equivalent to or slightly above the total compensation packages
provided in comparable districts.” This simply isn't true. The proposal offers
increases which are larger than those agreed upon by some of those districts
which have negotiated contracts this last year, but the total compensation in
our district would still be lower than almost all of those districts.
The letter also
stated that, as resources increase, needs increase. It is our opinion that this
is also inaccurate. The needs existed before the increased funding, and the
legislature was trying to address those needs. The needs remain essentially the
same. In the past, the district has survived financially by cutting the pay of
teachers in order to meet those needs. State funding is finally on the upswing.
Senate bills requiring more rigorous teacher evaluations, proficiency-based
teaching practices, and the district's decision to adopt a new grading system
and program demand more time, energy, and dedication from Central School
District's educators. No one is disputing the difficulty all teachers face in
continuing to provide the best education for the students in this district.
However, growing enrollment numbers, class size increases, and the short school
year are issues that still persist. These are the issues that place immediate
demands on teacher workloads and hinder student success. These are the very
issues at the forefront of negotiating a fair settlement. We believe the
district should maintain focus on the needs the legislature was trying to
address, like FTE, a full school year, and retaining the best
teachers.
Lastly, we were
very disheartened when the district announced that they could no longer make any
movement and called for mediation. We are glad to hear about the district’s hope
that both parties can come closer together during mediation so this situation
can be resolved, and we interpret the district’s stated desire to do so as an
assurance that their team will come into mediation with a willingness to make
movement so this can be resolved quickly.
Again, our
thanks to the district for directing you to us. If you have any questions, do
not hesitate to contact a member of the CEA bargaining team. We're proud to
serve our excellent teachers.
Sincerely,
Your CEA
Bargaining Team
Jane Swann at
ACES
Holly Boyles at
TMS
Chrissy
Eichelberger at IES
Krysia Bliss at
MES
Benjamin Gorman
at CHS
If
people in the community would also be interested in the most accurate
information about the state of negotiations, we encourage you to follow the
district’s advice and contact the CEA at CEACentral13J@gmail.com Also, please
attend the board meeting rescheduled for the 16th.
No comments:
Post a Comment